Publications Search
David Jensen
Data Snooping, Dredging and Fishing: The Dark Side of Data Mining, A SIGKDD99 Panel Report Journal Article
In: SIGKDD Explor., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 52–54, 2000.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags:
@article{DBLP:journals/sigkdd/Jensen00,
title = {Data Snooping, Dredging and Fishing: The Dark Side of Data Mining,
A SIGKDD99 Panel Report},
author = {David Jensen},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/846183.846195},
doi = {10.1145/846183.846195},
year = {2000},
date = {2000-01-01},
journal = {SIGKDD Explor.},
volume = {1},
number = {2},
pages = {52--54},
abstract = {This article briefly describes a panel discussion at SIGKDD99.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
P Utgoff, Victor Lesser, David Jensen
Inferring task structure from data Miscellaneous
2000.
@misc{utgoff2000inferring,
title = {Inferring task structure from data},
author = {P Utgoff and Victor Lesser and David Jensen},
url = {https://web.cs.umass.edu/publication/docs/2000/UM-CS-2000-054.pdf},
year = {2000},
date = {2000-01-01},
publisher = {University of Massachusetts, Department of Computer Science. Technical~…},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
Jennifer Neville, David Jensen
Iterative classification in relational data Proceedings Article
In: Proc. AAAI-2000 workshop on learning statistical models from relational data, pp. 13–20, 2000.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags:
@inproceedings{neville2000iterative,
title = {Iterative classification in relational data},
author = {Jennifer Neville and David Jensen},
url = {https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.3.5425&rep=rep1&type=pdf},
year = {2000},
date = {2000-01-01},
booktitle = {Proc. AAAI-2000 workshop on learning statistical models from relational data},
pages = {13--20},
abstract = {Relational data offer a unique opportunity for improving the classification accuracy of statistical models. If two objects are related, inferring something about one object can aid inferences about the other. We present an iterative classification procedure that exploits this characteristic of relational data. This approach uses simple Bayesian classifiers in an iterative fashion, dynamically updating the attributes of some objects as inferences are made about related objects. Inferences made with high confidence in initial iterations are fed back into the data and are used to inform subsequent inferences about related objects. We evaluate the performance of this approach on a binary classification task. Experiments indicate that iterative classification significantly increases accuracy when compared to a single-pass approach.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}
David Jensen
Knowledge Discovery from Graphs (Invited Talk) Proceedings Article
In: Graph Drawing, 8th International Symposium, GD 2000, Colonial Williamsburg, VA, USA, September 20-23, 2000, Proceedings, pp. 170, Springer, 2000.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags:
@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/gd/Jensen00,
title = {Knowledge Discovery from Graphs (Invited Talk)},
author = {David Jensen},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44541-2_16},
doi = {10.1007/3-540-44541-2_16},
year = {2000},
date = {2000-01-01},
booktitle = {Graph Drawing, 8th International Symposium, GD 2000, Colonial Williamsburg,
VA, USA, September 20-23, 2000, Proceedings},
volume = {1984},
pages = {170},
publisher = {Springer},
series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
abstract = {Knowledge discovery is the process of discovering useful and previously unknown knowledge by analyzing large databases. Knowledge discovery is also sometimes called “data mining” or “applied machine learning.” A new generation of knowledge discovery tools are beginning to address data that can be expressed as large graphs. Example applications include fraud detection in telecommunication networks and classifying Web pages based on hyperlink structure. These new technologies for knowledge discovery are becoming increasingly relevant to graph drawing. Specifically, graph drawing can aid the process of knowledge discovery by providing visualizations that reveal useful patterns in the data. Conversely, knowledge discovery can provide guidance for graph drawing by identifying recurring substructures or by classifying nodes into distinct types. Attempts to exploit the synergy between the two fields raises interesting new research questions. How should knowledge about a domain affect the drawing of graphs about that domain? What types of knowledge are most easily discovered using visualization, as opposed to automated statistical algorithms? These questions were posed in the context of several examples of knowledge discovery applied to large graphical data sets.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}
Lise Getoor, David Jensen
Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data: Papers from the AAAI Workshop Miscellaneous
2000.
@misc{getoor2000learning,
title = {Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data: Papers from the AAAI Workshop},
author = {Lise Getoor and David Jensen},
year = {2000},
date = {2000-01-01},
publisher = {AAAI Press},
abstract = {https://aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2000/WS-00-06/WS-00-06.pdf},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
David Jensen, Paul R. Cohen
Multiple Comparisons in Induction Algorithms Journal Article
In: Mach. Learn., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 309–338, 2000.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags:
@article{DBLP:journals/ml/JensenC00,
title = {Multiple Comparisons in Induction Algorithms},
author = {David Jensen and Paul R. Cohen},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007631014630},
doi = {10.1023/A:1007631014630},
year = {2000},
date = {2000-01-01},
journal = {Mach. Learn.},
volume = {38},
number = {3},
pages = {309--338},
abstract = {A single mechanism is responsible for three pathologies of induction algorithms: attribute selection errors, overfitting, and oversearching. In each pathology, induction algorithms compare multiple items based on scores from an evaluation function and select the item with the maximum score. We call this a multiple comparison procedure (MCP). We analyze the statistical properties of MCPs and show how failure to adjust for these properties leads to the pathologies. We also discuss approaches that can control pathological behavior, including Bonferroni adjustment, randomization testing, and cross-validation.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
David Jensen, H Goldberg
AAAI Fall Symposium on AI and Link Analysis Miscellaneous
1998.
BibTeX | Tags:
@misc{jensen1998aaai,
title = {AAAI Fall Symposium on AI and Link Analysis},
author = {David Jensen and H Goldberg},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-01-01},
publisher = {AAAI Press Menlo Park},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}